I was a Teenage Feminist

136 notes

Why I Don’t Follow Anti-Circumcision Blogs

I agree with the sentiment. I don’t think a person’s body should be modified unless they specifically consent to the procedure. 

My problem with anti-circumcision blogs comes from one argument, and one argument only: 

Female circumcision is condemned, so male circumcision should be as well. 

No, just no. 

Female genital mutilation is mainly practiced in parts of Africa and the Middle East by people with very little medical training in unsafe non-sterile environments. Female genital mutilation involves at the very least nicking and at most removing the clitoris. It sometimes involves sewing the vagina up completely so that only a little hole for menstrual blood to pass through is left. Women who experience the most serve type of mutilation often die during child birth, and have extreme pain during sexual intercourse. Almost all women who undergo any sort of genital mutilation lose the ability to orgasm.  

All of this is done as a way to control female sexuality. Female genital mutilation is performed to ensure that women do not have sexual pleasure or to ensure that they are virgins when they marry. It is a way of exerting control over women. 

Male circumcision involves cutting off the foreskin for aesthetic or religious purposes. Men who are circumcised still retain the ability to have sexual pleasure. They can still function normally. Male circumcision is performed in hospitals by doctors, the medical risks involved are considerably less. The ability to orgasm is not lost, and most men don’t face serious medical consequences as a result of their circumcision.      

I don’t believe in modifying someone’s body without their consent, male or female, but I do not like seeing male circumcision and female genital mutilation looked upon in the same light. They are not the same thing, and should never be treated as such.  

(Source: iamateenagefeminist)

Filed under circumcision female genital mutilation

  1. soulsidej0urney reblogged this from iamayoungfeminist
  2. rain-at-221b reblogged this from iamayoungfeminist
  3. regalgypsy reblogged this from iamayoungfeminist
  4. forcethedooropen reblogged this from spitblaze
  5. spitblaze reblogged this from rotifers
  6. fetalpile reblogged this from rotifers
  7. rotifers reblogged this from iamayoungfeminist and added:
    Fair enough.
  8. chameleon-panda-hybrid reblogged this from iamayoungfeminist
  9. mermanbutt reblogged this from iamayoungfeminist
  10. promfantasiesbye reblogged this from trans-continentalhustle
  11. so-tired-of-trying-to-fight-this reblogged this from iamayoungfeminist
  12. etherealwanderlust reblogged this from iamayoungfeminist
  13. thegreywardencommander reblogged this from iamayoungfeminist
  14. mommacrunchxo reblogged this from iamayoungfeminist
  15. trans-continentalhustle reblogged this from iamayoungfeminist and added:
    This and precisely this. My father is circumcised (thanks mum for the info). It has no affect on his life, his status or...
  16. 40h4error said: I can see where you’re coming from. I see it “as the same” in the way that both are things done without consent of the person. The reasons and the affects are very different, as you’ve explained. Neither should be tolerated or allowed.
  17. vegasbabydoll reblogged this from astheshadowslovethecastle
  18. astheshadowslovethecastle reblogged this from private-revolution
  19. shewhodancesunderthemoon reblogged this from iamayoungfeminist
  20. planetarygirl reblogged this from iamayoungfeminist and added:
    Just adding up that sometimes the male circumcision is even made by medical reasons. It’s just a whole different thing....